Central to Duska’s discussion is his conception of loyalty. Do you find his account of loyalty convincing? What elements of it might you disagree with? What implications might an altered conception of loyalty have on his contention that whistle-blowing does not require moral justification? Prepare a 600-700 word response in APA 6th ed. format. Your paper must include required readings and at least two external references. I need by Sunday 11/18/12 by 2pm EST.