Limit your response to 10 pages (including appendix) and submit a spreadsheet with your calculations.
All VaR and Expected Shortfall calculations, unless otherwise stated, are daily and at the 95%
confidence level.
Please also note: there is an associated Excel File “Allocations.xlsx”
You are a junior analyst for GAMBLE – a large, high-risk, high leverage hedge fund that specialises in
long-short global multi-asset strategies.
As part of your role, you have been assigned responsibility over monitoring the risks associated with
a small portfolio of securities, detailed in the allocation file on Canvas.
• UOS US Equity – Oil ETF denominated in USD
• QAN AU Equity – Qantas common stock
Given the prevailing market climate of elevated volatility and global uncertainty stemming from the
Coronavirus pandemic, the portfolio managers of the fund are keen not only to understand the market
risks they currently face, but also the strategies that should be implemented to protect the fund
against adverse market movements. You are to prepare a preliminary report for the risk management
committee. The report should cover short-term risk (1-day risk measures using data up to end of
March, 2020).


Part 1 [5 Marks]: Using the historical data, and assuming the current market value of each investment
is $100,000, calculate the
a) individual VaR of each security assuming a Gaussian (i.e. normal) distribution (2 marks)
b) individual VaR and Expected Shortfall of each security assuming the empirical distribution
provided (3 marks)
Part 2 [9 Marks]: Following on from your initial analysis, the portfolios managers would like to monitor
risk at a portfolio level. Specifically, they are interested in the risk metrics for the two-security
portfolio. Assume the portfolio is valued at $200,000 with equal weight allocated to each security.
a) Calculate the VaR of the portfolio as a whole using a Gaussian (i.e. normal) distribution
(2 marks)

b) Calculate the VaR and Expected Shortfall using the empirical distribution provided

(4 marks)
c) Compare these portfolio level results with your individual security-level results in Part 1. What
conclusions can be drawn around the suitability of the VaR and Expected shortfall as portfolio
risk evaluation metrics? (3 marks)
Part 3 [10 marks]: One of the challenges in risk management is estimating and monitoring volatility.
A more rigorous model for estimating and monitoring volatility using historical data is the generalized
autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) model. You have been asked by the portfolio
managers to examine the performance of a GARCH(1,1) for calculating VaR.

a) Using the portfolio returns that you have calculated in Part 2, model daily portfolio volatility
using a GARCH(1,1), assuming normally distributed returns. The model parameters should be
estimated by maximum likelihood. Present a graph of your volatility forecast along with actual
volatility for comparison. Discuss the appropriateness of the model. (5 marks)
b) Once you have obtained a series of variances, compute a parametric 95% 1-day VaR for each
trading day assuming zero mean. Days when the actual return exceeds the VaR are known as
exceptions. Calculate the number of exceptions (rt − VaRt) given your daily portfolio return
and VaR. (Make sure that you are using the LOSSES only). Has the GARCH(1,1) model resulted
in over- or underestimation of VaR? Should we reject GARCH (1,1) based on a Binomial test?
Discuss your results. (5 marks)
Part 4 [8 Marks]: As the portfolio is currently levered, you are concerned that the portfolio is too risky
and may be liquidated in accordance with its guidelines. To reduce the potential risk, you consider
using call/put options written on QAN.
• QAN AU 5 C3.5 Equity – Qantas call option with a strike price of $3.50 expiring on 28th May
• QAN AU 5 P2 Equity – Qantas put option with a strike price of $2.00 expiring on 28th May
(see the allocation file)
a) Select an appropriate option (call or put) to reduce the exposure of the portfolio. Using an
appropriate methodology discussed in class recalculate the VaR of the portfolio. (5 marks)
b) Comment on the effectiveness of the hedge (3 marks)
Part 5 [18 Marks]: Given the recent volatility, you are concerned about the stability of estimated
coefficients and distributional assumptions you are making in your analysis. For this question, focus
ONLY on your QANTAS and OIL positions (no options), with $100,000 invested into each security – i.e.
for this question, you will be working with a $200,000, two security portfolio.
a) Stress test the correlations of the portfolio using the copula technique discussed in class. First,
map the empirical returns (PDF) into standard uniform variables (CDF). Then simulate returns
by sampling from either a Gaussian or a Student-t joint distribution using appropriate copula
parameters and then map the simulated returns back into their original empirical marginal
distributions to calculate VaR and ES. (5 marks)
b) Carefully justify any decisions regarding Copula selection and methodology in your report
(3 marks)
c) Discuss why detailed study of correlations is relevant to your portfolio. (2 marks)
d) Using appropriate justifications, estimate appropriate copula parameters across high and low
correlation market scenarios (hint: see how the correlation changes through time. You can
define “high” and “low” correlation market structures as above/below median or use another
threshold). (2 marks)
e) Using the above copula parameters, recalculate VaR and ES across these high and low
correlation market scenarios. What observations and conclusions can you draw from your
results? (6 marks)
Additional Hints
• This assignment is deliberately open ended. Do not panic.
• Although 10 pages are allocated for this assessment, we encourage you to answer succinctly – and
wisely utilise the generous page limit for setting out your calculations and methodology.
Specifically, we would like to see clear discussion around the models and formulae used, as well
as the use of tables and charts to clarify your results.

• A substantial proportion of marks will be awarded for discussion around the insights gained from
your analysis, not just descriptive recollections of your methodology. We encourage you to think
about what you are doing, why and the implications of your results.
• There is no limit on what methodologies or analytical frameworks may or may not be applied in
this assignment. It is recommended that full reference to all relevant materials covered in the
• Additional research is not essential even to get full marks, but the task is flexible if students do
want to attempt to go the extra mile. Additional research in the form of plagiarism will result in a
• Clearly state all your assumptions.
• VaR needs to be stated in AUD
• Mechanical application of various techniques, or discussion that patently lacks understanding
around the underlying methodology is the fastest and most efficient way to fail this assignment.


Study Cred Tutor

4.6 (24k+)

Purchase the answer to view it



Click one of our contacts below to chat on WhatsApp

× How can I help you?