I’m working on a Philosophy question and need guidance to help me study.
Requirements:
No plagiarism
Good grammar- complete thoughts
Deep response- Good arguments
250 words minimum for each
- If a woman need not consider the interests of the fetus in having an abortion, then need she also not consider the interest of the fetus in a case of isotretinoin treatment, for example?
2-By now you should be becoming more sensitive to how much sloppiness can be introduced into ethics by a careless deploying of a ‘harm’ criterion. So let’s give this a try:
If the wrongness of gossip and slander derives from the harm of gossip and slander, then if the gossip or slander is harmless, then are they permissible? Why or why not?
