Mgmt 520 Legal Political And Ethical Dimensions Business

HomeworkMarket

• 0

Home.Literature.Help.

• Contact Us
• FAQ

Log in / Sign up

Log in / Sign up

Help.MGMT 520 Legal, Political and Ethical Dimensions of Business neel (Not rated) (Not rated)Chat

• Main

Home>Human Resource Management homework help

How would Pollard’s case be impacted if her replacement had been a female? Would her case be different? Would her damages be different? Explain your answer.

Q2

The CEO asks you to review the sexual harassment policy currently in place that Virginia signed. He wants you to provide him with suggestions for changes to it. Review the policy and give three recommendations for changes, enhancements, and ideas for making the policy stronger. Include your reasons for these suggestions. If you find information online for making these changes, include citations and/or links to that information. Explain how your suggestions may have protected Teddy’s in this case. Support these recommendations with current case law.

Q3

The circuit court overturned the decision of the NJ Human Rights Commission that had found that Pollard was the victim of sexual harassment and disparate treatment. Please answer these questions: A. Define sexual harassment, including both quid pro quo and hostile environment harassment. Which type(s) do you feel Pollard was a victim of (if either)? Provide law or a case to support your position. If you feel Pollard was not a victim of harassment in this case, explain why you feel that way, and provide law or a case to support your position. 
B. Name an appellate court case in which an employer was found liable for either quid pro quo or hostile environment sexual harassment. Describe the facts of the case and the decision the court came to in the case. Explain whether you think that case applies to Pollard’s case (why or why not) and whether you would want to use this case in Teddy’s favor or whether Pollard may use it in her favor. Include the citation to the case and a link to it online. 
C. Do you agree that Pollard was disparately treated? Why or why not? In your answer, define disparate treatment.  
D. Does the existence of a sexual harassment policy provide a defense to Teddy’s in this case? Why or why not? (Include the name and citation of at least two federal or state sexual harassment cases that provide precedent support to your defense statement.)

Q4

Teddy’s Supplies’ CEO has asked you to advise him on the facts of the case and your opinion of their potential liability. Write a memo to him that states your view of whether the company is exposed to liability on all issues you feel are in play. Include in your memo any laws that apply and any precedent cases either for or against Teddy’s case that impact liability. Include your opinion of the “worst case” of damages the company may have to pay to Virginia.

• 8 years ago

Report IssueDiscussion postedDiscussion posted1250

Purchase the answer to view it



• pollard.docx
• teddys_supplies_ceo.docx
• the_ceo.docx
• the_circuit_court.docx



plagiarism checkPurchase $32

1. Applied Sciences
2. Architecture and Design
3. Biology
4. Business & Finance
5. Chemistry
6. Computer Science
7. Geography
8. Geology
9. Education
10. Engineering
11. English
12. Environmental science
13. Spanish
14. Government
15. History
16. Human Resource Management
17. Information Systems
18. Law
19. Literature
20. Mathematics
21. Nursing
22. Physics
23. Political Science
24. Psychology
25. Reading
26. Science
27. Social Science
• Home
• Homework Answers
• Blog
• Archive
• Tags
• Reviews
• Contact
• • 

  • Answer